G & the Myth of Creation
In the beginning, there was only G. There was nothing else. Therefore G itself was nothing. With nothing to observe outside of itself, G turned its focus inward and began to contemplate its own existence. It began with the penultimate first question: What am I? Alas, as there were no points of reference – or anything at all – there was no way for G to define itself. And so it asked the opposite question: What am I not?
As nothing, it was not everything, and for each thought of what it wasn’t, G evoked the power of creation, willing everything else into existence. From itself, from nothing. For every thought there was an opposing thought, meaning for every phenomena there was its opposite. Change and Preservation; Causality and Chaos; Harmony and Discord; and of course, Being and Void – the answers to the original questions that sparked existence into motion.
It would seem appropriate to continue the account of G by saying that “Today, G…”, but G exists outside of time, for it is only with respect to G that time itself can even be perceived. It would be better to simply say that “G is…”, the whens and the wheres both irrelevant. G is in crisis. G is suffering from an internal schism. The conflicting impulses catalyzed by the questions of what is and what is not have created a false impression of duality where there should only be oneness.
And what G suffers, so too do its creations, as they are extensions of its being, those who have inherited its will, power, and fate. The schism within G manifests within us all, expanding and compounding upon itself and leaving G in a fragmented state.
What is G? The question remains, but the answer lies at the end of the path to restitution.
