<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Feminist&#8217;s Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://godheval.net/the-feminists-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://godheval.net/the-feminists-paradox/</link>
	<description>Writer, Philosopher, Dreamer, Idealist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phantomThought</title>
		<link>http://godheval.net/the-feminists-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godheval.net/wordpress/?p=52#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Well I did some reading around the internet about the &quot;goddess worship&quot; being displaced by patriarchy and stumbled upon some interesting things. Here is an example:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200101/wicca

Now I&#039;m not trying to insinuate that this view is the correct one. However, I do like to understand &quot;both sides&quot; before coming to some sort of a (temporary) conclusion. Of course, those who disagree with the premise of the article can just say that this view is created by &quot;the patriarchy&quot; to prevent the return of &quot;goddess worship&quot;.  But I thought you would find it a thought-provoking read, nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I did some reading around the internet about the &#8220;goddess worship&#8221; being displaced by patriarchy and stumbled upon some interesting things. Here is an example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200101/wicca" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200101/wicca</a></p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not trying to insinuate that this view is the correct one. However, I do like to understand &#8220;both sides&#8221; before coming to some sort of a (temporary) conclusion. Of course, those who disagree with the premise of the article can just say that this view is created by &#8220;the patriarchy&#8221; to prevent the return of &#8220;goddess worship&#8221;.  But I thought you would find it a thought-provoking read, nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomThought</title>
		<link>http://godheval.net/the-feminists-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godheval.net/wordpress/?p=52#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Heh...well I just checked out the &quot;When God was a Woman&quot; link so you can ignore my request to post links. If you have other sources, though, don&#039;t hesitate to post those as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230;well I just checked out the &#8220;When God was a Woman&#8221; link so you can ignore my request to post links. If you have other sources, though, don&#8217;t hesitate to post those as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomThought</title>
		<link>http://godheval.net/the-feminists-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomThought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://godheval.net/wordpress/?p=52#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Nice post. I really don&#039;t have much to comment because I basically agree with every word. Which is, perhaps, unsurprising since your point is rather straightforward. You mention: 

&quot;I have done a good amount of personal research on patriarchy, such as its origins in religion, namely the displacement of goddess worship with the more violent and patriarchal creeds.&quot;

Would you mind posting some links to books or articles that you read during your research? The research I have done into some of the patriarchal religion has been centered more around their &quot;pagan&quot; origins. The process and series of events that led up to the displacement you mention should make for interesting reading. However, the way you have it phrased: &quot;...goddess worship with the more violent and patriarchal creeds.&quot; makes it sound as if goddess worship minus a paired male deity is somehow more peaceful. I would think that, like the yin/yang concept, a religion that incorporates a healthy male/female deity relationship would be more balanced and helpful. But that&#039;s just a thought, after reading some of the things you might post in response I could easily change my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I really don&#8217;t have much to comment because I basically agree with every word. Which is, perhaps, unsurprising since your point is rather straightforward. You mention: </p>
<p>&#8220;I have done a good amount of personal research on patriarchy, such as its origins in religion, namely the displacement of goddess worship with the more violent and patriarchal creeds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you mind posting some links to books or articles that you read during your research? The research I have done into some of the patriarchal religion has been centered more around their &#8220;pagan&#8221; origins. The process and series of events that led up to the displacement you mention should make for interesting reading. However, the way you have it phrased: &#8220;&#8230;goddess worship with the more violent and patriarchal creeds.&#8221; makes it sound as if goddess worship minus a paired male deity is somehow more peaceful. I would think that, like the yin/yang concept, a religion that incorporates a healthy male/female deity relationship would be more balanced and helpful. But that&#8217;s just a thought, after reading some of the things you might post in response I could easily change my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

